SHA-224 Benchmarks and Comparisons

Interactive performance testing and detailed algorithm comparisons

Interactive Benchmarks

Test SHA-224 performance directly in your browser and compare it to other hash algorithms. Select input size and algorithms to compare, then run the benchmark to see real-time results.

Algorithm Comparison

How does SHA-224 compare to other hash algorithms in terms of security, performance, and features?

Security Comparison

Algorithm Output Size Security Level Collision Resistance Status Known Vulnerabilities
MD5 128 bits Broken Broken Deprecated Collision attacks demonstrated, practical preimage resistance weaknesses
SHA-1 160 bits Weak Broken Deprecated Collision attacks demonstrated (SHAttered), theoretical weaknesses
SHA-224 224 bits 112-bit Strong Active No known practical attacks
SHA-256 256 bits 128-bit Strong Active No known practical attacks
SHA-384 384 bits 192-bit Strong Active No known practical attacks
SHA-512 512 bits 256-bit Strong Active No known practical attacks
SHA3-224 224 bits 112-bit Very Strong Active No known practical attacks
BLAKE2b Variable (up to 512 bits) Up to 256-bit Very Strong Active No known practical attacks

Security Level Explained

The security level of a hash function is typically half its output size due to the birthday paradox. For cryptographic applications:

  • 112-bit security (like SHA-224) is considered strong for most current applications
  • 128-bit security (like SHA-256) provides a substantial margin against future advances
  • 192-bit and 256-bit security levels provide protection against quantum computing attacks

SHA-224 Security

SHA-224 is essentially SHA-256 with a different initialization vector and truncated output. It inherits the strong security properties of SHA-256, with slightly reduced collision resistance (112-bit vs 128-bit security level).

For most applications, including digital signatures, file integrity verification, and HMAC, SHA-224 provides adequate security while offering slightly better performance and smaller hash values than SHA-256.

Performance Comparison

Algorithm CPU Throughput
(Higher is better)
Memory Usage
(Lower is better)
Hardware
Acceleration
Parallelization
MD5 Very High
(~2850 MB/s)
Low
(~2.1 MB)
Limited Poor
SHA-1 High
(~1980 MB/s)
Low
(~2.2 MB)
Common Poor
SHA-224 Moderate
(~1250 MB/s)
Low
(~2.3 MB)
Widespread Poor
SHA-256 Moderate
(~1220 MB/s)
Low
(~2.3 MB)
Widespread Poor
SHA-384 Moderate
(~780 MB/s)
Moderate
(~3.5 MB)
Common Poor
SHA-512 Moderate
(~750 MB/s)
Moderate
(~3.5 MB)
Common Poor
SHA3-224 Low
(~480 MB/s)
Moderate
(~4.2 MB)
Growing Good
BLAKE2b High
(~1620 MB/s)
Low
(~2.5 MB)
Limited Excellent
BLAKE3 Very High
(~3250 MB/s)
Low
(~2.2 MB)
Limited Excellent

Performance Considerations

SHA-224 offers several performance advantages:

  • Slightly faster than SHA-256 due to truncated output (1-3% performance improvement)
  • Hardware acceleration on modern CPUs (Intel SHA Extensions, ARM Cryptography Extensions)
  • Smaller output size (224 bits vs 256 bits) reduces storage and transmission requirements
  • Same internal state size as SHA-256, allowing existing optimized implementations to be leveraged

Performance vs. Security

When choosing between SHA-224 and alternatives, consider the performance-security tradeoff:

  • For maximum security with good performance: SHA-256 or BLAKE2b
  • For balanced security and performance: SHA-224
  • For maximum performance with good security: BLAKE3
  • For quantum-resistant security: SHA-512 or SHA3-384

Feature Comparison

Feature MD5 SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-256 SHA3-224 BLAKE2b BLAKE3
Variable Output Size No No No No No Yes Yes
Key Support (Keyed Hash) No No No No Yes (KMAC) Yes (Built-in) Yes (Built-in)
Streaming Support Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (Improved)
Parallelizable No No No No Limited Yes Yes (Tree Mode)
Constant-Time Implementation Varies Varies Typically Typically Yes Yes Yes
Standard HMAC Support Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Library/SDK Support Universal Universal Widespread Universal Growing Widespread Growing
Hardware Acceleration Limited Common Widespread Widespread Limited Rare Rare

Key SHA-224 Features

SHA-224 offers several distinctive features that make it suitable for specific applications:

  • 224-bit (28-byte) output: Ideal for scenarios where smaller hash size is beneficial but SHA-1 is insecure
  • 112-bit security level: Sufficient for most current cryptographic applications
  • FIPS 180-4 standardization: Widely approved for government and regulated industry use
  • Broad library support: Available in virtually all cryptographic libraries and programming environments
  • Hardware acceleration: Optimized implementations in modern CPUs through SHA-NI and similar extensions

Specialized Use Cases

The 224-bit output size makes SHA-224 particularly well-suited for:

  • TLS/SSL certificates requiring a specific security level
  • Legacy 2048-bit RSA signatures (matches 112-bit security level)
  • Embedded systems with limited storage or transmission capabilities
  • Content-addressed storage systems requiring compact identifiers

Adoption and Implementation

Standards & Certifications

  • FIPS 180-4: SHA-224 is a NIST-approved hash function
  • FIPS 140-2/3: Approved for use in validated cryptographic modules
  • ISO/IEC 10118-3: International standard for hash functions
  • RFC 3874: SHA-224 specification and implementation guidance
  • RFC 5754: SHA-224 use in cryptographic message syntax
  • Common Criteria: Accepted for various security certification levels

Industry Adoption

  • TLS/SSL: Supported in cipher suites (though SHA-256 is more common)
  • X.509 Certificates: Used for digital signatures in some certificate profiles
  • Government Systems: Widely used in FIPS-compliant applications
  • Financial Services: Used in secure transaction systems and HSMs
  • Healthcare: Used in HIPAA-compliant systems for data integrity
  • IoT/Embedded: Adopted where output size matters but security cannot be compromised

Programming Language Support

Language SHA-224 Support Implementation
JavaScript Native Web Crypto API, Node.js crypto
Python Native hashlib
Java Native MessageDigest, java.security
C/C++ Native OpenSSL, Crypto++, LibreSSL
C#/.NET Native System.Security.Cryptography
Ruby Native Digest::SHA2
Go Native crypto/sha256
PHP Native hash() function
Rust Native RustCrypto, ring
Swift Native CryptoKit

SHA-224 vs. SHA-256 Adoption

While SHA-224 is widely supported, SHA-256 typically sees broader adoption for several reasons:

  • Higher security margin: 128-bit vs. 112-bit security level
  • Familiarity and convention: SHA-256 is more commonly referenced in standards
  • Future-proofing: Many systems default to SHA-256 to provide longer-term security

SHA-224 is specifically chosen when:

  • The output size needs to be exactly 224 bits (28 bytes)
  • 112-bit security level is appropriate for the application's risk profile
  • Storage or bandwidth constraints make the smaller output size beneficial
  • The system needs to match the security level of other 112-bit secure components

Optimal Use Cases for SHA-224

Based on performance and security characteristics, here are the scenarios where SHA-224 is particularly well-suited:

Digital Signatures

SHA-224 is ideal for digital signature applications where:

  • The signature is based on 2048-bit RSA (matching 112-bit security level)
  • Reduced signature size is beneficial for bandwidth-constrained environments
  • FIPS compliance is required but SHA-1 is not acceptable
// JavaScript example using Web Crypto API
async function generateSignature(message, privateKey) {
  const encoder = new TextEncoder();
  const data = encoder.encode(message);
  
  // SHA-224 is appropriate for a 2048-bit RSA key
  const signature = await window.crypto.subtle.sign(
    {
      name: "RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5",
      hash: {name: "SHA-224"},
    },
    privateKey,
    data
  );
  
  return signature;
}

Embedded Systems

SHA-224 strikes an excellent balance for resource-constrained devices:

  • Smaller hash size reduces storage and transmission requirements
  • Hardware acceleration is available on many embedded processors
  • Provides adequate security without excessive computational demands
  • NIST-approved for regulated applications
// C example optimized for embedded systems
#include "sha224.h"

void verify_firmware_integrity(const uint8_t *firmware, size_t length, const uint8_t expected_hash[28]) {
  SHA224_CTX ctx;
  uint8_t hash[28];
  
  SHA224_Init(&ctx);
  SHA224_Update(&ctx, firmware, length);
  SHA224_Final(hash, &ctx);
  
  // Compare computed hash with expected hash
  if (memcmp(hash, expected_hash, 28) == 0) {
    // Firmware integrity verified
    execute_firmware(firmware);
  } else {
    // Integrity check failed
    report_error();
  }
}

Content-Addressable Storage

SHA-224's moderate output size is beneficial for content-addressing systems:

  • Shorter identifiers than SHA-256 while maintaining cryptographic security
  • Reduced storage overhead in large-scale content catalogs
  • Minimal collision risk for practical data volumes
  • Efficient performance for high-throughput content ingestion
# Python example for content-addressable storage
import hashlib
import os

class ContentStore:
    def __init__(self, base_path):
        self.base_path = base_path
        os.makedirs(base_path, exist_ok=True)
    
    def store(self, data):
        """Store data and return its SHA-224 content address"""
        # Calculate SHA-224 hash
        hash_obj = hashlib.sha224(data)
        content_id = hash_obj.hexdigest()
        
        # Organize files in a directory structure based on hash prefix
        prefix = content_id[:4]
        dir_path = os.path.join(self.base_path, prefix)
        os.makedirs(dir_path, exist_ok=True)
        
        # Store data if it doesn't already exist
        file_path = os.path.join(dir_path, content_id)
        if not os.path.exists(file_path):
            with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
                f.write(data)
        
        return content_id
    
    def retrieve(self, content_id):
        """Retrieve data by its SHA-224 content address"""
        prefix = content_id[:4]
        file_path = os.path.join(self.base_path, prefix, content_id)
        
        if os.path.exists(file_path):
            with open(file_path, 'rb') as f:
                return f.read()
        return None

Networked Applications

The reduced output size of SHA-224 is beneficial for network-intensive applications:

  • 12.5% smaller hash values compared to SHA-256 (28 vs 32 bytes)
  • Lower bandwidth requirements for applications transmitting many hashes
  • Reduced storage overhead in distributed ledgers and databases
  • Improved performance in bandwidth-constrained environments
// Node.js example for a distributed data verification system
const crypto = require('crypto');
const net = require('net');

// Using SHA-224 instead of SHA-256 reduces network traffic by 12.5%
// when transmitting hash values
function createDataVerifier() {
  const server = net.createServer((socket) => {
    socket.on('data', (data) => {
      // Parse the incoming verification request
      const request = JSON.parse(data.toString());
      
      // Calculate SHA-224 hash of the payload
      const hash = crypto.createHash('sha224')
        .update(request.payload)
        .digest('hex');
      
      // Compare with claimed hash
      const verified = hash === request.claimedHash;
      
      // Send verification result
      socket.write(JSON.stringify({
        verified,
        actualHash: hash
      }));
    });
  });
  
  return server;
}

Conclusion

SHA-224 offers a compelling balance of security, performance, and compatibility that makes it well-suited for many cryptographic applications. While it doesn't provide the absolute highest security level or performance among hash functions, its position as a NIST-approved algorithm with widespread support, hardware acceleration, and 112-bit security makes it an excellent choice for practical applications where these characteristics are valued.

Key Takeaways

  • Security: SHA-224 provides 112-bit security, sufficient for most current applications
  • Performance: Slightly faster than SHA-256 with wide hardware acceleration support
  • Size Advantage: 12.5% smaller output than SHA-256, beneficial for storage and network efficiency
  • Standardization: FIPS-approved and widely implemented across platforms

Decision Guide: Should You Use SHA-224?

Choose SHA-224 when:

  • You need a FIPS-approved hash function with good performance
  • 112-bit security level is sufficient for your application
  • Hash size optimization benefits your storage or bandwidth constraints
  • Other components in your system use a 112-bit security level
  • Hardware acceleration support is available and important

Consider alternatives when:

  • You need maximum long-term security (consider SHA-256 or SHA-512)
  • Performance is the absolute priority (consider BLAKE3)
  • Quantum resistance is a requirement (consider SHA-384 or SHA-512)
  • You need specialized features like variable output length (consider BLAKE2)

Additional Resources